About us
The world’s most trusted eSIM database
560,948 plans from 102 providers across 234 destinations, read from each provider’s own catalogue and re-checked every day. We do not sell eSIMs. We rank the people who do.
- Plans tracked
- 560,948
- Providers
- 102
- Destinations
- 234
Refreshed 12 days ago
Why we can say that
Trust is a claim, and a claim is worth what you can check. Here is what ours rests on, and where to go to check each part of it.
Why use eSIMradar
We sell nothing
You buy direct from the provider. A commission cannot move a rank.
2 GB a day
We rank on the gigabytes a trip can actually spend, not the headline size.
560,948 plans
102 providers, 234 destinations, read from source every day.
No dead codes
Expired vouchers are removed, never left struck through.
Where the numbers come from
Each provider publishes a catalogue. We read it directly, normalise every plan into one shape, and rank the result. A price on this site is the provider’s own price at the moment we last read it, in US dollars with taxes included.
Where a provider quotes in another currency we show that figure rather than converting it, because that is the amount the card is charged. Anything we convert ourselves carries a ≈, so the two are never confused for each other.
We re-check every provider daily and record a price point whenever one actually moves. The live badge at the top of a page says when the data behind that page was last refreshed, and a plan’s price history is what we observed rather than what anyone told us.
Everything on this site is published twice: as the page you are reading and as plain Markdown under /md, listed in llms.txt. That is what makes “checkable” more than a word. Anything we claim can be read, diffed against yesterday and argued with by something that is not a browser.
How we make money
We earn a commission when a reader buys through an outbound link, at no extra cost to them. Those links carry rel="sponsored nofollow", and the page says so before you click one.
A commercial relationship decides which plans we put forward: eligibility for the top pick marker, the "Recommended providers" shelf, a place on the labelled partner shelf, which holds at most 4, and which plans the "Recommended" tab of a board lists. It decides nothing about the order of any list. The ranking is computed before we know who pays us, a provider with no relationship at all is ranked on identical maths, and the board's other three sorts carry every plan we hold.
We also show Google ads between the rows on a plan board. They are labelled, they are spaced far apart, and Google chooses them: an advertiser cannot buy a top pick, a place on the recommended providers shelf or a place on the Recommended tab by buying a banner.
What we leave out
A comparison is also what it refuses to carry. Three things never reach a board:
- Plans priced under $0.10. A per-gigabyte figure of nearly zero wins every value ordering and tells you nothing: the entries below that line are a freemium teaser and a data error, and between them they used to set the entry price for dozens of destinations.
- Providers who have asked to be removed. We take a catalogue down on request and put it back the day they ask, and neither is a judgement about them.
- Voucher codes that have stopped working. They are deleted rather than struck through, so a code on this site was live when the page was built.
One number that explains the rest
80,572 plans in this catalogue are sold as unlimited. 47,121 of them publish the daily allowance they slow down at. The word is the sales pitch and the allowance is the product, which is why we rank an unlimited plan on its allowance where there is one, and say plainly where there is not.
Run an eSIM service? Get listed
Reading this site with something other than a browser? llms.txt